Nepal’s recent political landscape has been marked by waves of youth-led protests that have challenged the status quo. The Gen Z movement, which gained momentum in the mid September 2025, represented a powerful call for transparency, accountability, and systemic change. What began as peaceful demonstrations soon escalated into violent confrontations, leaving a trail of questions about state response and responsibility.
At the heart of the ongoing Nepal Gen Z movement inquiry lies a high-level commission tasked with investigating two pivotal days: the forceful crackdown on protesters on 23 Bhadra (September 9, 2025) and the widespread arson and vandalism that followed on 24 Bhadra. The commission’s work has now reached a critical juncture, as it prepares to summon two of the most senior figures from the then-government: former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak.
The Gen Z Movement: A Youth-Led Uprising
The protests were driven by a younger generation frustrated with chronic corruption, economic stagnation, and political instability. Demonstrators, many in their late teens and early twenties, took to the streets demanding reforms in governance, an end to nepotism, and better opportunities for Nepal’s youth.
The turning point came on 23 Bhadra, when thousands gathered near the parliament building in Baneshwor. Security forces responded with tear gas, batons, and eventually live ammunition, resulting in multiple casualties and injuries. The following day, 24 Bhadra, saw chaos as buildings were set ablaze and public property vandalized. The violence shocked the nation and led to widespread calls for an independent investigation.
Formation and Mandate of the Inquiry Commission
In response to public pressure, the government established an independent inquiry commission to examine the events of those two days. The commission’s mandate includes:
- Determining the sequence of events and the chain of command
- Identifying those responsible for the use of excessive force
- Assessing the circumstances that led to the arson and destruction
- Recommending legal and administrative actions
The commission has been working methodically, recording statements from security personnel, commanding officers, district officials, and senior bureaucrats. It has already interviewed those who were directly involved in the on-ground operations, including officers who fired shots and the Chief District Officer who issued written orders for the use of force.
Progress of the Investigation
The commission is now in the final stages of collecting lower-level testimonies. Former Chief District Officer of Kathmandu, Chhabi Raj Rijal, is currently providing his statement, while some portions of the testimony from current Inspector General of Police (IGP) Dan Bahadur Karki (then Additional IGP) remain pending. These are expected to conclude within the next few days.
Once these statements are complete, the commission plans to formally summon the two highest-ranking officials from the government at the time: former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli and former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak.
Summoning High-Level Figures: A Delicate Process
The commission intends to issue official letters to both leaders, granting them at least one week to appear. The summons will be served by commission staff or police personnel, ensuring legal formality.
Former Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak
According to sources, Lekhak has already indicated his willingness to cooperate. He has reportedly conveyed through a commission member that he is ready to appear on any mutually convenient date with prior notice. This suggests that securing his statement may proceed smoothly.
Former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli
The situation with Oli is more complex. In a recent interview with Himalaya Television, the former prime minister made strong public statements, declaring that he would not appear before the commission. He questioned the body’s credibility and said he was prepared to face arrest—or even extreme measures—if necessary for refusing to cooperate.
The commission is deliberating several options:
- Serving the summons at Oli’s residence and obtaining a receipt if accepted
- Affixing the notice to his house wall if he refuses
- Publishing the summons through media outlets
Officials are also discussing potential consequences for non-cooperation, such as fines or arrest, though they acknowledge that forcibly bringing someone before the commission without their willingness to speak would have limited investigative value.
Commission’s Commitment to Impartiality
Commission member and spokesperson Dr. Bigyan Raj Sharma has been clear about the body’s stance:
“Some people doubt whether we will actually summon high-level figures. We will not give any special treatment or immunity to anyone required to appear. All relevant individuals will be brought within the scope of the investigation.”
The commission has already prepared a detailed framework of questions for the former Prime Minister and Home Minister, based on evidence and statements collected so far.
Broader Implications for Nepal’s Democracy
The Nepal Gen Z movement inquiry represents one of the most significant attempts in recent years to hold senior political leaders accountable for decisions made during a national crisis. The outcome could have far-reaching consequences:
- It may set a precedent for how future protests are managed
- It could influence public trust in state institutions
- It might affect the political careers of key figures
- It has the potential to shape Nepal’s ongoing debate on governance and youth participation
The youth who spearheaded the movement have consistently demanded transparency and justice. The commission’s ability to conduct a fair and thorough investigation will be closely watched by both domestic and international observers.
What Lies Ahead?
The next few weeks will be crucial. The commission is expected to issue the summons shortly after completing the remaining statements. Whether the former leaders appear voluntarily and how they respond to questioning will shape the direction of the inquiry.
If cooperation is forthcoming, the commission could produce a comprehensive report that clarifies the events, assigns responsibility, and proposes reforms. If resistance persists, the process may become more contentious, potentially prolonging the investigation and fueling further political debate.https://nepalnews.com/
Final Thoughts
Nepal stands at a crossroads. The Gen Z movement exposed deep frustrations among the younger generation, while the subsequent violence raised serious questions about the use of state power. The ongoing Nepal Gen Z movement inquiry offers an opportunity to address those questions openly and honestly.
For a nation that has seen frequent political upheavals, this investigation could mark a turning point—either toward greater accountability or toward deeper division. The coming days will reveal whether Nepal’s institutions are capable of rising to the challenge.https://theinfohatch.com/who-is-going-to-be-pm-after-modi/